And speaking of Minneapolis, security forces are bracing for still more violence when the trial of former cop Derek Chauvin, accused of murdering George Floyd, gets under way this month - and don’t for a moment think the rioting will be confined to the Twin Cities, especially if a jury reaches the “wrong” verdict.ĭemocrats spent years soft-pedaling jihadist terror, slandering Americans concerned about it as “Islamophobes.” There was nothing mysterious about this. Swaths of Minneapolis now resemble a third-world war zone. In Seattle, for example, antifa and its confederates presumed to seize territory and operate an autonomous zone - a provocation that has been imitated in other cities. 6 joint session of Congress was occurring inside the complex, it insults our intelligence to suggest that the violence has not interfered with important government business, or that government officials and other people were not gravely imperiled just as they were in the Capitol riot.Īnd it’s not like Portland is the only place where the radical left is raging. And while nothing quite as significant as the constitutionally-mandated Jan. Durbin and Judge Garland minimize the siege of the Portland courthouse, as if all that happened were a few hours of graffiti spraying, as opposed to weeks of firebombs and other forcible attacks. What’s occurring is not mere vandalism its leading forces justly regard themselves as revolutionaries against our society and constitutional system. Government buildings have been attacked, as have businesses - many of them destroyed, along with the financial well-being of the innocent people who built them. Many police have been killed and injured, as have innocent bystanders and rioters. There are spikes and lulls, but it has never completely stopped. The left’s siege against the cities has gone on for eight months. The siege included assaults on Capitol Police and though the claim that one officer was brutally killed by rioters is dubious (and has been walked back since first made), four other people also died - all apparently from among the pro-Trump protesters, one killed by security forces, the other three perishing, it appears, from medical conditions exacerbated by the mayhem.Īspects of the left-wing violence are both more and less serious than the Capitol riot - making any comparison meaningless. It was timed with the goal of frustrating a solemn constitutional duty of the federal government to tabulate the states’ electoral votes in order to formally recognize the winner of the presidential election. It was, nevertheless, a violent attack on the seat of our government. Anyone who honestly tried to rank the divergently motivated threats based on their comparative gravity would quickly abandon the effort as counterproductive. In truth, all the violence we are seeing is equally condemnable, regardless of which side is responsible and for which supposedly noble causes they claim to be fighting. To rank ideologically motivated violence, under the present circumstances, is to divide the country politically, flouting a principle that ought to be unifying us. Thus did Durbin indulge the same comparison spouted in the same committee last week by Judge Merrick Garland, President Biden’s attorney general nominee: Months of rampant violence by the radical left, exemplified by the siege on a federal courthouse in Portland, is mere criminal vandalism, whereas a few hours of violence by the radical right, carried out at the Capitol on Jan. White supremacism, by contrast, is a terrorist threat that Democrats are hell-bent on hanging like a leper’s bell around the necks of their Republican opposition. Antifa, the Orwellian name of a Marxist insurrectionary movement, is a terrorist threat that Democrats insist must not be seen for what it is, nor notice taken of the political ramifications - certainly, you are not to notice that antifa colludes with such left-wing darlings as Black Lives Matter in attacks on police officers and government installations. Sounding awfully equivocal, Senate Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Mich.) claimed at a Tuesday hearing to “join my Republican colleagues, unequivocally, in condemning left-wing violence.” “But,” he hastened to add - and you just knew there was one of those totally unequivocal “buts” coming, right? - “let’s stop pretending that the threat of antifa is equivalent to the white supremacist threat.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |